Sunday, August 14, 2016

The Psychopathology of Judaism



Judaism is not merely a religion, as many Jews are overt atheists or agnostics, and they do not consider themselves less Jewish for all that.  They are also the only group that has individuals that sometimes hold a "crypto" identity, or, in other words, hide or "secretly practice" their beliefs. Jewry is also not a race. So, the whole idea that a “trained eye" can recognize a Jewish appearance or a characteristic pattern which is the result of their strict observance of endogamy for centuries, is pretty much a bunch of propaganda.

Jews see themselves as the “chosen ones” of God, and marriage outside the community is strictly frowned upon. However, mixed marriages do exist and have also helped to renew the blood of the Pharisees during all the centuries spent in the various ghettos where the Jews preferred to live, separately and apart from the rest of the population.

The essential condition for such mixed marriages is that the mother be Jewish since Orthodox Rabbis recognize as Jewish only the child born of a Jewish mother. However, having just a Jewish father or grandparent can suffice for a person to identify completely with Judaism. Jewishness is, therefore, a “mental race” that has been shaped over the centuries by the Hebrew religion and the project of Judaism.  This whole idea is nothing more than a fraud that has been perpetuated and sustained upon this world for way too long.

What Judaism actually is:

Judaism is a Political Project

Judaism is essentially a political project. It is important for Jews to work toward the emergence of a world at “peace,” a peace meant to be universal and permanent. It is therefore not a coincidence that this word “peace” (shalom in Hebrew) is found frequently in Jewish discourse worldwide. In the perfect world that they are building, all conflicts will supposedly disappear between the nations. 

This is why Jews have been militating tirelessly for many years for the abolition of all borders, the dissolution of national identities and the establishment of a global empire of “peace.”

The very existence of separate nations is considered to be responsible for the triggering of wars and turmoil. so they must be weakened and eventually replaced by a world government, a “one world government,” a “New World Order,” one single world-ruling authority that will supposedly permit happiness and prosperity to reign,  Jewish-style, on earth. 

We find this idea more or less developed both in the writings of certain intellectual Marxists such as Karl Marx himself and the Jewish-French philosopher Jacques Derrida and also in the discourse of liberal thinkers such as Karl Popper, Milton Friedman, and France’s Alain Minc. The idea is to unify the world by all means necessary and to generate cultural conflicts that will weaken nation-states. It is for this One World that intellectuals Jews labour tirelessly all over the world. Whether they call themselves left- or right-wing, liberal or Marxist, believers or atheists, they are the most ardent propagandists of the pluralistic society and of racial mixture. 

One we acknowledge this, we must begin to wonder, when there is a preponderance of insincerity that comes from the mouths of the war mongering think tanks, the policy makers, and  their presidential and prime ministerial stooge front men and women, should you actually believe any of them?

At one time, this "World Government" project was potentially going to be implemented through the United Nations, that is until the UN declared Zionism a form of racism.  At this time, the burden of Zionism was shifted onto the shoulders of the "New Jerusalem" of the United States and its flexing arm of NATO.

Thus, many of the Jews in the "public eye" in the world – encourage large amounts of immigration into every country in which they are located because the disintegration of national identity in each nation and the massive presence of immigrants is designed to prevent the original population from succeeding in any nationalistic outbursts against the Jewish sway over finance, politics, and the media.

Most Jewish intellectuals are focused on this question of building the “pluralistic society” and for this they practice constant vigilance against "political incorrectness.”  This is a fallout of Cultural Marxism with origins in the Frankfurt school.

In France, influential writers and journalists such as Bernard-Henri Levy, Jacques Attali, Jean Daniel, Guy Sorman, and Guy Konopniki agree on pluralism and anti-racism despite their political divergences in other areas. Now we can understand better why the former communists and leftists of the 1970's did not have to make such a big leap to become today’s “neoconservatives.” They have merely switched to a different strategy to achieve the same goal: the rule by racially pure Jews over a racially mixed society.

The fact is that after the second Palestinian intifada began in October 2000, the Jews in France and the rest of the Western world have realized that nowadays the danger to their interests and their project comes primarily from Islam and from young African immigrants, both Arabic and black. Their aim is to strengthen the modern race-mixing and race-blending society, which they have contributed so much to establish in the country of France. But this mosaic now threatens to break up into separate communities, and this the Jews do not want. They want no separate identities or separateness at all, except a separate Jewish identity and Jewish separateness. This was why former Marxists in France such as Alexandre Adler, AndrĂ© Glucksmann, and Pascal Bruckner thus supported, along with Alain Finkielkraut, the right-wing, pro-Washington, pro-Zionist party of Nicolas Sarkozy in his time. And yet they never became French patriots. They react only for the exclusive benefit of Jewry, asking, as American Jews proverbially do on every issue: “Is it good for the Jews ?”

“Tolerance” as a Weapon

The members of the Jewish sect are the most proselytizing people on earth, but unlike Christians or Muslims, who dream of converting all peoples of all races to their faith, the Jews have no plan to convert the world to their own faith of Judaism, but simply to encourage other nationalities to give up their national and religious identities – and live only for the goal of “tolerance” and "coexistence."

The unceasing campaigns to blame nothing but white people for slavery, colonialism, the plundering of the Third World or for Auschwitz have no other purpose than heaping blame on one race of people while creating constant race and class conflict. This in turn, diverts the attention of the populace from the real rulers and their hidden agenda. 

Many Jews believe the day will come when they are universally recognized by everyone on earth as God’s “chosen people.” Their “mission” (and Jews frequently use this term “mission”) is to disarm the other peoples, to dissolve anything which is not Jewish or Jewish-controlled, to grind the people down to a powder for making a new identity-free work force, and thus to favor a universal “peace” among the peoples who have no more “divisive” identities. The Messiah, coming from Israel, and awaited for three thousand years, will establish anew the kingdom of David and will give the Jews an empire over all the earth. And certain Jewish texts explicitly call for this.

Jews are therefore continuously encouraged to campaign, in whatever society they inhabit, in order to promote the unification of the world – and thus to also hasten the arrival of their promised and cherished Messiah. Propaganda is a Jewish speciality, and it is no coincidence that Jews become so influential in all the media. In their hands, the concepts of “tolerance” and  political correctness, or "happy face" fascism have become incredibly efficient weapons of guilt and accusation against the majority of their fellow countrymen. In fact, it is not through the tired and worn out propaganda of Jewish physical appearance that we can best recognise Jews, but rather from what they write and say in the media wherever they are on earth.

Selective Amnesia 

Even Winston Churchill and the famed writer and former Gulag prisoner Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (see here,) have commented on the influence of the Jews in the Bolshevik Revolution and the Russian Communist experience that lead to some thirty million deaths. This isn't even mentioning the later problems which led to the inevitable collapse of the Communist regime in 1991, and the propagation of  unspeakable levels of looting and corruption from Russian Jewish organized crime, (see here and here,) after the fall of the Soviet Union at the time of Boris Yeltsin.

Let us remember that Karl Marx was born into a Jewish family and that Lenin himself had a Jewish maternal grandfather, that Leon Trotsky, the Bolshevik founder and head of the Red Army, was born a Bronstein, while Kamenev (real name: Rosenfeld) and Zinoviev (real name: Apfelbaum) were running the two Bolshevik-conquered capitals of Moscow and St. Petersburg. But the list of Jews who stood out in the mega-crimes of Communism is endless. It must be said and it must be repeated: Jewish officials and Jewish torturers bore a very heavy responsibility in this tragedy.


The “perfect” world they concocted and which was supposed to be “historically inevitable”, turned out from the very beginning to be a nightmare for the Russian population. It was not until 1948 when the Jewish intellectual elite began distancing itself from the Stalinist government, and this was only because Stalin had launched his “anti-Zionist” campaign, meant to purge pro-Israel Jews from senior leadership positions.


The indisputable Jewish guilt for the gigantic crimes of Bolshevism is now systematically being shoved down the Memory Hole (the phrase from George Orwell’s 1984). In Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s 2002 book Two Centuries Together, the Nobel Laureate and 11-year veteran of the Bolshevik gulag expresses outrage that Jewish intellectuals were still refusing to recognize their ethnic responsibility in the slaughter of millions of Christians. Solzhenitsyn also denounces modern Jews who pose as victims of an “anti-Semitic” Bolshevik government when that government was in fact heavily Jewish and Jews were among the worst perpetrators.


This selective amnesia is necessary for a people who ceaselessly proclaim their “innocence” of any provocative acts, as we regularly note in their writings, for example in an editorial inIsrael magazine of April 2003, “the first Israeli monthly magazine in the French language” written under the name of a certain AndrĂ© Darmon. He wrote: “To kill a Jew or a child makes God cry, for we are exterminating [in the Jew] the bearer of universal ethics and innocence.”



No less!

With this mindset of absolute innocence Jews cannot conceive bearing any responsibility for their atrocities. Jews are only victims, only “scapegoats” in an evil and hostile world. But very soon the Messiah will punish the “wicked” and will restore the victimized sons of Israel to their full rights.
Nevertheless, in this same Israel magazine editorial, a certain Frederick Stroussi asserted that the Nazi government was worse than the Stalin regime. He quoted the cruelties he claimed were perpetrated by certain SS men. For example, we learn from Stroussi that the Latvian SS man Cukur’s hobby was to toss Jewish babies in the air to shoot them in their head as in skeet shooting.

Perhaps some of these stories are once again a case of a Jew using  “projection” syndrome, that is, accusing others systematically of one’s very own crimes as a matter of consistent PR policy: always attack. We know in fact – even if the media never speak about it – that many Jews and their rabbis are involved in the felony crime of pedophilia and that there are passages in the Talmud where it is certainly debatable that it supports it. (see Psychanalyse du Judaisme, 2007).


Even more surprising, are the revelations of tenured professor Ariel Toaff of Bar Eilan University in Israel – the son of the former Grand Rabbi of Rome – and buttressed in February 2007 by his 147-page, heavily footnoted, scholarly work Pasqua di Sangue [ Blood Passover] – reveals proof of ritual murder among some Ashkenazi Jews (Jews of Eastern European origin).



Emotional Fragility

We outsiders are thus supposed to understand that the sufferings of Jews cannot be compared to those of any others. As a consequence, we are supposed to get as indignant as they do when a serious historian such as Stephane Courtois states (in the preface of his famous Black Book of Communism): “The death of a Ukrainian child of Kulak origin [ from the independent farmer class] who is deliberately forced to starve to death by the Stalinist government is as significant as the death of a Jewish child in the Warsaw ghetto.”

These simple words were enough to provoke the ire of Frederic Stroussi who declares he was “stunned” by such an affront. Such a remark, according to him, was “despicable” and represented a vulgar attack against Israel: “What does this comparison have to do here?” he writes. “Why do we have to use the slaughter of a Jewish child to transmit this underlying, false and hateful rumor that the Jews overshadow all other victims of totalitarianism and monopolize all the attention on themselves?”

The author of the article, as we can notice, reacts in a outraged and totally disproportionate way to the modest and certainly justified intentions of the level-headed historian Stephane Courtois. Stroussi demonstrates here the “great intolerance to the frustration” which are characteristic of some Jews. Such reactions are clearly not “normal.”

We note that Israel magazine is a monthly magazine designed for the Jewish community and that, consequently, one can hardly accuse Frederick Sroussi of lying to goyish readers, or hiding from the goyim the true nature of Bolshevism and the supposedly malefic cruelty of the SS. His discourse here does not correspond to any false dialectic, as anti-Semites claim, but here, in this magazine by and for Jews, he is reflecting, as a Jew among Jews, writing to Jews, the very essence of their soul: 1) We are always innocent – and 2) Jewish lives are more valuable than those of others.

There is an “attack anti-Semitism” that stems from a failure to understand the Jewish identity and only sees deliberate perfidy where there is in reality a genuine existential anxiety, one generated by a deep psychological dysfunction.

Hysterical People

The Jews have never dared to collectively approach the mirror on their inner lives represented by Freudian psychoanalysis, a prism through which Freud claimed to see all humanity, but which, on closer analysis, sheds far more light on the specific neuroses of Judaism. Psychoanalysis, like Marxism, is a “Jewish science” and a product of the Jewish mind. It was therefore logical to wonder how this Freudian “discovery” corresponds to Jewish specification.
Jewry is well-known for these syndromes: Hysteria, chauvinism, depression, mental illness, intelligence, introspection, manipulation, in some cases out right lying or lying by omission, ambivalent identity, sexual ambiguity, and so on. Every Jewish symptom is found in hysteria.
Freud, as a loyal Jew, merely projected the traits of a specific community onto the rest of humanity. In reality, there is no “Oedipus complex” but rather a Pharisaical Jewish complex (all Jews together technically being Oedipus). 
It is interesting that many Jewish writers use the same term to refer to the coming of their Messiah, namely, the “delivery” of the Messiah. The whole Jewish community, we must understand, is “the wife of God” (the Shekhinah of the Kabbalist) who is some day supposed to give birth to the Messiah, and thus the whole of Jewry is indeed suffering from a “nervous pregnancy” not unlike that found in nervous, hysterical women.
Karl Kraus, the Austrian Jewish journalist who did not agree with Freud, wrote sarcastically: “Psychoanalysis is the mental illness of which it claims to be the cure.” But the right and the best formula can be stated in ten words: “Judaism is the disease that psychoanalysis is meant to cure.”

The Sexual Revolution

After Freud, other Jewish thinkers came along who produced a symbiosis between Freudian doctrine and Marxism. Wilhelm Reich and Herbert Marcuse preached sexual revolution in order to break down the patriarchal family and unleash “free sex.” Their theories largely inspired the student riots of May ’68. The 1970s saw a new wave of Freudo-Marxism and Jewish women were in the forefront (such as Gisele Halimi and Elisabeth Badinter in France and Bella Abzug, Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem in the USA). 

A great wave of the influential and creative vent went into this “liberation” from traditional "lifestyles" and family values through the medium of movies, plays and theatre, TV programming, newspapers, magazines and literatureHere we are compelled to note that Jewish producers and film directors play a very important role in the porn industry. See here and see my La Mafia Juive [The Jewish Mafia], 400 pages, 2008). Parallel to this, the Freudian concept of bisexuality favored the acceptance of overt “gay pride” and homosexuality.


A War Machine against Humanity
and Against Men and Women


In fact, one of the tangible side effects of this moral “liberation” was the systematic destruction of the very laws the Jews themselves supposedly are meant to uphold in the Old Testament, i.e.- the difference between men and woman, see Why Gender Matters by Leonard Sax M.D. Ph.D.  The appeal of gender egalitarianism intended by liberal Jewry – tends to level all differences and identities of men and women in general to where neither knows nor cares to know their role in society.

There has been more than enough tireless denouncements of men in TV shows and sitcoms, movies and modern literature. This is actually an active war and affront to the Old and New Testament, in the sense that men are to be the safe guards of a society in peril.  This has always been known throughout history. It is interesting, that in Shakespeare, when the men don't play their roles properly, the women assume the role of men and do it for them.

We can also see this happening in the book of Judges when God either brings up individuals of moral ambiguity or in another sense, a woman,  like Deborah to be judges of their society. The more you understand what is happening in the Old and New Testament, the more you realize that the forces and rulers of of this world know this. 
So, we can see part of the agenda of the "sexual revolution" was about making men and especially women more excepting of hedonism, this was the hidden agenda to sever the connection between man and God. A woman's biological nature cannot be separated from procreation, this being so, one of the consequences of this is that they usually favour security and material prosperity.

This is a part of the fall of man in the garden of Eden and it is one of the distractions that separates mans bond with God. We see something similar in the Odyssey, when man must be careful to not be lured by the Siren song  of the beautiful creatures who promise much but might be detrimental to his end goals. When it comes to politics, man must realize that woman have the potential to distract- we see the same idea in Shakespeare with Antony and Cleopatra. 

Jewish Chauvinism and the Perpetual
 War with the Gentiles

Yitzhak Attia, director of French-language seminars at the Yad Vashem Holocaust institute in Tel Aviv wrote this himself in the same issue of Israel magazine:

Even if reason tells us, even shouts with all its force the very absurdity of this confrontation between the small and insignificant people of Israel [i.e, all Jewry worldwide, not just “the State of Israel”] and the rest of humanity… as absurd, as incoherent and as monstrous as it may seem, we are engaged in close combat between Israel and the Nations – and it can only be genocidal and total because it is about our and their identities.

You read it right : Between the Jewish people and the rest of humanity the struggle can only be “genocidal and total.” The “peace” in which Israel intends to confer is no more and no less than “genocide,” the warrant for the execution of all humanity – except for those allowed to live as culture-less slaves.
The Neutralization of the Devil

The question is whether the aggressiveness of Judaism can be neutralized in order to save humanity from its evils, evils that could prove even more serious than some of the horror of Communism. First of all, we must face the facts: After all these centuries of mutual misunderstanding, the Christians, the Muslims, and Hitler have all failed to resolve the Jewish question. 

The fact is that some elements of Judaism really do feed on and grow off the hatred they have engendered among all the peoples of this world. It has allowed them for many centuries now to close ranks within their community against an external enemy, while other civilizations have disappeared.


For their part, the rabbis spare no efforts to keep their gene pool Jewish. And so even a renegade Jew remains a Jew, and therefore it is perfectly useless to attempt to leave the Jewish prison community. Judaism is indeed a prison. Claiming that a Jew cannot ever stop being Jewish works in favor of Jewry’s survival. 
Our mission must be to accommodate these sick among us, because the Jews are not “perfidious” people as much as they are sick people to be cured.

Jews are to be loved individually and sincerely in order to free them from the prison in which they are locked. Only then will they become free from the cult’s grip – and from the threat they pose to themselves and to all humanity. 
Only then we will become free from this grip, and at the same time, they will free themselves from the evil inside them that threatens all mankind.

No comments:

Post a Comment