Showing posts with label Jews Hollywood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jews Hollywood. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 1, 2018

Marlon Brando- "I'm Very Angry With Some Of The Jews- They Run Hollywood- They Should Be More Sensitive To People Who Are Suffering"

Right from the mouth of the Godfather... just as I say here and here. Worse than the ones in Hollywood are the Jews on Wall Street and intelligence. The reality is, if you look into the history of the CIA, you will see that it connects to Wall Street. Intelligence is connected to protecting the class interests and resources of the insiders of banking and corporate business. This includes the drug trade.

Wednesday, March 8, 2017

Absolute MUST SEE- Celebrities Bowing To Their Jewish Masters

Kissing The Ass Of Zion Is Very Lucrative. Celebrities Posing With Jewish Chabad "Orthodox" Fanatics, Wearing Kippahs, Posing With Israeli War Criminals... 

Tuesday, January 3, 2017

Jews Who Control Hollywood Tell Stars: Better Not Mention Palestine

The article below is from the same time that the activities took place in Gaza during 2014. The article is still relevant though because you always wonder why Hollywood personalities are willing to speak out about some atrocities... and yet, why they keep their mouth's shut about others genocides, and mass slaughters. Maybe this is why.

=============================================================================




It’s official: Right now the No. 1 rule in Hollywood is that you can talk about anything political—except Israel’s attack on the Christians and Muslims in Gaza, Palestine. That’s not a conspiracy theory from critics of Israel or Jew-hating neo-Nazis. Instead, that was the thesis of a candid article in the August 1 edition of The Hollywood Reporter (THR), influential trade journal of the entertainment industry.

In fact, the article was bluntly titled: “Rule 1: Talk About Anything Political in Hollywood . . . Except Gaza.”

That such an article would appear in a magazine considered “must” reading for those in show business was a not-so-subtle warning that anyone who violates that rule is in for a tough road ahead.

Noting several celebrities had expressed sympathies for the plight of Gaza, THR commented ominously that—“for now at least” —powerful Jewish moguls in Hollywood were simply dismissing those entertainers as being “uninformed.” However, continue speaking out this way and there will be trouble.

Adding breezily that it is commonplace for Hollywood executives “to be on a first name basis with prominent Israeli politicians and business leaders,” THR cooed that this intimacy with Israel explains why so many Hollywood figures who otherwise have much to say about a lot of political issues are silent about Gaza—with only a few exceptions.

Those exceptions—which caused a stir in Jewish circles and a big buzz in Hollywood—included such well-known names as husband-and-wife acting team Javier Bardem and Penelope Cruz (both Academy Award winners) and two-time Oscar-winning director Pedro Almodavor, who joined dozens of fellow Spanish actors, directors, musicians and writers in an open letter condemning the assault on Gaza, describing Israel’s policies as “genocide.”

Meanwhile, American actor Jon Voight jumped into action, charging Bardem, Ms. Cruz and their colleagues with “inciting anti-Semitism,” which, of course, brought denials from the accused. Ms. Cruz rushed to explain she was “not an expert” and shouldn’t be misunderstood.

Voight has spent his own entire career vocally proving his love for Israel, well aware it is common knowledge among Hollywood power brokers that his late uncle—the legendary political writer Joseph P. Kamp—was an outspoken critic of Jewish intrigues, particularly targeting the notorious Anti-Defamation League, a big player in Hollywood affairs. (Also, see here and here for more about the ADL.) Kamp—by the way—was a contributing editor to The Spotlight. Voight’s equally politically-outspoken daughter, actress Angelina Jolie, has made it so big she is now a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

THR reported that powerful Hollywood kingpin Haim Saban, (also see here,) —an Israeli citizen—drafted a statement responding to Israel’s critics that was “so strong” that—after being sent to his publicist for review—was never issued. In short: Saban is really mad, and Israel’s critics better watch out. After all, billionaire Saban, who has said his number one concern is protecting Israel, puts his money where his mouth is, bankrolling endeavors—such as the Saban Center at the Brookings Institution in Washington—that promote the Zionist agenda.

In two other Gaza-related “scandals,” actress Selena Gomez dared to post an image on “Instagram” that read: “It’s about humanity. Pray for Gaza,” and popular hip-hopper Rihanna posted “Free Palestine” to the Internet. After coming under fire, Ms. Gomez assured fans she wasn’t taking sides and Rihanna deleted her own post eight minutes after posting it.

Comic Jackie Mason—a trained rabbi—told conservative radio host Aaron Klein that entertainment industry critics of Israel come from “anti-Semitic, low-class backgrounds where a Jew is the most disgusting thing in the world to them.”

THR quoted Ken Solomon, chairman and chief executive officer of The Tennis Channel, Inc., and top Democratic fundraiser—whose grandparents lived in Israel. Solomon, who audaciously said in response to Rihanna and the others: “I think there’s a place for celebrities to get involved, whether it’s the environment or social issues. But getting involved in foreign policy debates? It doesn’t make a lot of sense. . . . With all due respect to Rihanna, unless she’s been studying this, she shouldn’t be talking about it.” In other words, in foreign policy, unless you’re pro-Israel, just shut up.

Jewish comic Joan Rivers, born Joan Molinsky, would have no problem with that argument. Believing Israel is imperiled, she once said: “I worry they’re going to wipe it off the Earth. I only hope they [Israel] will take us all with them, because Jews shouldn’t go quietly this time. If they’re going to kill us, we’re going to kill you right back.”

Those violent comments, it seems, are acceptable, since, after all, Ms. Rivers is Jewish and pro-Israel.

Monday, January 2, 2017

Jews Boast of Owning Hollywood—But Slam Gentiles Who Say the Same

Besides reading the article below, see here for more about who controls the porn industry and why it is important. Yes, it is fine for them to say it, but not you nor him. Not you a mere mortal.  Didn't you know this? Where does this come from? Mostly from the Talmud.

============================================================================

The all-out attack by the Jewish Supremacist “Anti-Defamation League” (ADL) (see here and here for more about the ADL,) on actor Gary Oldman for daring to mention that Jews run Hollywood has highlighted the fact that Jews can routinely boast about that fact—but if a Gentile says the same thing, they are attacked as “anti-Semites.”

Oldman (known for roles like Harry Potter’s Sirius Black and spy George Smiley in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy), when asked in a recent Playboy interview about actor/producer Mel Gibson’s earlier remarks about Jews, said that “Mel Gibson is in a town that’s run by Jews and he said the wrong thing because he’s actually bitten the hand that I guess has fed him.” (See here for Marlon Brando saying the same thing to Larry King on CNN.)

For this “sin” Oldman was condemned by the ADL and immediately issued a groveling apology, saying that he hoped his “heartfelt apology would be received as genuine as he intended it to be” and that he has “nothing against Jews.”



This apology was however not good enough for the ADL’s Abe Foxman, who in a press statement said that “We have just begun a conversation with his managing producer”—in other words that the Jewish Supremacists will now be seeking to smash Oldman’s career.

“While his apology may be heartfelt, Mr. Oldman does not understand why his words about Jewish control were so damaging and offensive, and it is therefore insufficient,” Foxman added.

However, Foxman has never said anything when his fellow Jews have said exactly what Oldman said—and even more.

For example, the Jewish journalist Joel Stein, who used to write for the Los Angeles Times and who currently writes for Time magazine, wrote a large article in the LA Times on December 19, 2008, titled “Is Hollywood Run by Jews? You Bet.”


In this article (now “retitled” on the LA Times website as “Who runs Hollywood? C’mon”—obviously the original title was too truthful), Stein explained precisely how Jews control Hollywood:

I have never been so upset by a poll in my life. Only 22% of Americans now believe “the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews,” down from nearly 50% in 1964. The Anti-Defamation League, which released the poll results last month, sees in these numbers a victory against stereotyping. Actually, it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood.

How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah.

The person they were yelling at in that ad was SAG President Alan Rosenberg (take a guess). The scathing rebuttal to the ad was written by entertainment super-agent Ari Emanuel (Jew with Israeli parents) on the Huffington Post, which is owned by Arianna Huffington (not Jewish and has never worked in Hollywood.)

The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish.

As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you’d be flipping between “The 700 Club” and “Davey and Goliath” on TV all day.

So I’ve taken it upon myself to re-convince America that Jews run Hollywood by launching a public relations campaign because that’s what we do best. I’m weighing several slogans, including: “Hollywood: More Jewish than ever!”; “Hollywood: From the people who brought you the Bible”; and “Hollywood: If you enjoy TV and movies, then you probably like Jews after all.”

 Significantly, Stein ended his boastful article with the following illuminating comment:

 But I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.

Stein has not had his “employers spoken to” by Foxman and the ADL, unlike the unfortunate Gary Oldman.

The difference is, of course, that the Jews are perfectly happy as long as it is they who boast about their control of Hollywood—but woe betide any Gentile who dares to say the same thing—they are just anti-Semites.

Stein is not the only prominent Jewish journalist to have boasted about Jewish control of Hollywood.

In August 1996, the Jewish magazine Moment (which describes itself as “North America’s premier Jewish magazine, founded in 1975 by Nobel Prize laureate Elie Wiesel”) ran a front page article titled “Jews Run Hollywood—So What?” written by Jewish journalist Michael Medved.


(This article too, has been “retitled” on the Moment magazine archives to “Is Hollywood too Jewish?” also because the original title was too truthful.)

Medved said in the article that:

It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most influential production executives at each of the major movie studios will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names.

The article then describes how the Jew Michael Eisner, the Head of Walt Disney studios only hires “highly paid Jewish moguls” as producers such as Jeffrey Katzenberg, Michael Ovitz, Joe Roth (former head of 20th Century Fox).

Medved also reveals how Jews also took over the only major Hollywood studio which was run by Gentiles: the Walt Disney Corporation:

The famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt Disney, a gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harboured anti-Semitic attitudes, now features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most powerful positions.

Medved continues:

Men and women of Jewish background enjoy a vastly disproportionate—if not dominate—influence in Hollywood.

He also points out that even studios which were bought out by the Japanese Sony Corp. and by Rupert Murdoch, still had to hire

a Yiddish team of long-time industry leaders in all the most powerful positions. When Mitsushita took over MCA-Universal, they did nothing to undermine the unquestioned authority of Universal’s legendary—and all-Jewish—management triad of Lew Wasserman, Sid Scheinberg and Tom Pollack.

 Medved added that most of the movie moguls of today graduated from Ivy League colleges, “where Jews are vastly over-represented—just as they are in Hollywood.”

He says that nepotism plays a role exemplified with Samuel Goldwyn Pictures being run by the son of founder Samuel Goldwyn and a third generation, Tony Goldwyn, is waiting in the wings to take over.

He adds:

This dynastic tendency in American entertainment certainly is a factor in the continued prominence of the Jewish role.

While Hollywood never stops portraying whites as degenerate criminals at every conceivable occasion, Jews are always portrayed as heroes, according to Medved:

Jewish writers and directors employ unquestionably flattering depictions of Jews for audiences to react with sympathy and affection.

Interestingly, Medved also pointed out that the general public was aware of the Jewish control of Hollywood, and that this degenerative effect was the cause of resentment:

Poll after poll, taken over the past 10 years, shows that the public believes this industry is more firmly associated with Jews than any other business in the world. That it is almost universally viewed as a destructive force in our society should be of concern.

And he ends with this significant remark:

The combined weight of so many Jews in one of America’s most lucrative and important industries gives the Jews of Hollywood a great deal of political power. They are a major source of money for Democratic candidates. The industry’s informal patriarch, MCA chairman Lew Wasserman, wields tremendous personal clout in state and national politics. So do Barbara Streisand, Norman Lear and others.

Once again, Medved has never had his “employers spoken to” or had his career derailed by the Foxmans of the world—simply because he is Jewish and allowed to say these things.

There is even a commercially available book about the Jewish control of Hollywood, written by the Jew Neal Gabler, titled An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood.



Gabler is a Senior Fellow at the USC Annenberg Norman Lear Center and is a cohost along with Medved of the American film review show, Sneak Previews (which ran for over two decades on the Public Broadcasting Service).

His 512 page book details precisely how Jews have taken over and run Hollywood. On page 263, Gabler even describes this takeover as the work of a “Jewish cabal.”

On the first page of his book he states how the industry was “supervised” by Jews, goes on to detail the workings of the “Jewish network”, and specifies how the studios “preferred to deal with other Jews”(p.272).

Gabler also reveals that the Hollywood Jews practice anti-Gentile discrimination.

“Those goyim!” Harry Warner would yell in derision, or “He’s a nice fellow for a goy” a Jew might say but only in their inner sanctums, when they were safe among fellow Jews, and only verbally. (p.280).

According to the book’s official description, this “wonderful history of the golden age of the movie moguls” (Chicago Tribune ) is a provocative, original, and richly entertaining group biography of the Jewish immigrants who were the moving forces behind the creation of America’s motion picture industry.


That subtitle may inspire in some readers waves of ethnic pride, and in others waves of ethnic revulsion, but the point of this book is that its claim of origin is quite literally true. And what makes it an interesting read for political types is the way it demonstrates that no matter how much the founding Hollywood moguls and their successors tried to peddle an idealized, escapist form of entertainment, bubbling up under and around their every project was ideology, racism, ethnic prejudice, class friction, domestic and international politics and all the other raw, seething stuff that distinguishes this country from all others. In Gabler’s hands, the Industry draws a picture of American political history in spite of itself.

Once again, the Jewish Supremacist hypocrites like Foxman did not “speak to Gabler’s employers” or otherwise smash his career.

Instead, the Jewish-owned New York Times described Gabler’s book as “enthralling book of social history.”

The book was adapted into a documentary movie in 1998. As usual, the film has two titles, distributed to different markets: Hollywoodism: Jews, Movies and the American Dream (original title for A&E) and Hollywood: An Empire of Their Own (title for video/DVD).

Unless You Are Jewish, You Are Nobody in Hollywood

Could the same thing apply to Silicon Valley, Wall Street, Banking and Finance, the Media, the Publishing Industry, Academia, the Intelligence Industry and Think Tanks? That is for you to decide and for you to research. I am only exposing you to some information that is very rarely shown or heard about.